- Recipes explain how to build customer-owned integration code from tested examples.
- The authoring skill explains how to inspect, compile, and evaluate a Checkfu Agent project.
Print an integration recipe
List the embedded catalog:Install the authoring skill
Install the shippedcheckfu-agent-authoring skill into a supported user-level layout:
checkfu agent info . --jsonbefore edits;- the closed project paths under
checkfu.json,agent/, andscenarios/; checkfu agent compile .and inspection of.checkfu/current.json;checkfu eval .and the closed observation format; and- the rule that
.checkfuevidence is not committed or uploaded without explicit authorization.
agent apply, remote Agent mutations, MCP tools, or Session operations by itself.
Keep authoring authority explicit
A coding agent edits candidate source. A Git commit, pull request, local plan, or proposal does not reserve a Checkfu resource. Repository CI owns review and merge policy for ordinary Agent authoring. Use canonical Agent operations for direct changes, or runcheckfu agent plan
and checkfu agent apply on a checked-in Agent project. Those commands write
Agent configuration only. Budgets, grants, Connections, Automations, and Memory
are created through their own operations.
Follow authorization and concurrency errors through the supported resource
workflow. Retrying through SDK, CLI, or MCP grants no additional authority.
See Authoring authority.
Recipe or Agent project?
Use a recipe for code that stays in your stack. Use an Agent project for desired Agent configuration. Use MCP only as another authenticated interface over the served public contract.
Continue with Author an Agent project for the human workflow.